Where the demand in this dataset actually comes from. This page always shows the whole portfolio — the location filter above does not apply, so shares stay comparable.
Generated from the records currently in scope — observation, why it matters, and the decision it points to. Nothing here is written in advance; every figure recomputes on the next upload.
0 location(s) fall below the minimum sample and are left out.
No data in scope.
Share of searches falling on the three largest locations.
Median stated budget across all included locations.
Share of searches per location, largest first · Period: – – – · 0 searches
Volume, price level and product signal per location. Confidence follows the sample-size thresholds in Settings.
No locations with data in the selected period.
Locations grouped into market tiers so each asset is compared with its peer group rather than a single portfolio median.
No tier has data in the selected period.
All locations in the same city added together. Read it as: how many people searched, how many sent an enquiry, and what they can afford per month.
Searches – people who used the room search on the website.
Enquiries – people who then sent a contact request (a lead).
Typical budget – the middle monthly rent people named (half said more, half less).
No cities with data in the selected period.