Enter the rent and unit assumptions of a scheme and see how much of the observed demand actually supports them. Nothing here is a valuation — it is a demand test.
Generated from the records currently in scope — observation, why it matters, and the decision it points to. Nothing here is written in advance; every figure recomputes on the next upload.
Figures apply to the currently filtered scope shown in the bar above.
Share of stated budgets that still cover EUR 900 per month.
Share of stated budgets that sit below the target rent.
No median available.
Target rent divided by the planned room size.
Leads whose stated budget covers the target rent, within the current filters.
No usable configurator size data.
Share of occupancy clicks choosing a single room.
Arithmetic only: target rent × units × 12. It assumes full occupancy and says nothing about achievability.
No valid budgets in scope.
Each assumption tested against the recorded demand in the current scope.
No valid budgets in scope, or no target rent entered.
No median budget available in scope.
No usable configurator size activity in scope.
No occupancy interactions in scope.
No valid stay lengths in scope.
No dated searches in scope.
No usable lead times in scope.
Only 0 valid budgets in scope — below the medium-confidence threshold of 30.
The planned 22.0 m² room sits in the cluster highlighted below.
How much of each location's demand survives the target rent, using the same rule as the portfolio figure.
No data in the selected scope.
Budgets are stated intentions collected at exit intent, not verified affordability or signed leases. Treat the retained-demand share as a relative indicator of price resistance, not as an occupancy forecast.